[whatwg] Content encoding (e.g. compression) in Web Sockets
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Mar 2 17:50:57 PST 2010
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Doug Simpkinson wrote:
> If the headers are optional, is there a reason they can't be added to
> the spec in version 1? It's OK if the first implementations ignore it,
> but it seems that some implementations have a faster release cycle than
> IETF protocol spec updates, so the upside to having it in the spec
> sooner is huge.
There's no reason we can't update the spec quickly.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg