[whatwg] Content encoding (e.g. compression) in Web Sockets

[Ian Hickson]

On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Doug Simpkinson wrote:
>
> If the headers are optional, is there a reason they can't be added to 
> the spec in version 1?  It's OK if the first implementations ignore it, 
> but it seems that some implementations have a faster release cycle than 
> IETF protocol spec updates, so the upside to having it in the spec 
> sooner is huge.

There's no reason we can't update the spec quickly.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'