[whatwg] "Content-Disposition" property for <a> tags
ian at hixie.ch
Sun Sep 26 09:01:35 PDT 2010
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Dennis Joachimsthaler wrote:
> I'd like to bring this back to attention.
> I don't want this to be forgotten before anybody who is "official" has
> said their definitive yes or no about it.
This thread has in fact already received an "official" reply:
That e-mail received a reply that I haven't responded to yet:
> Or how else do new additions find their way into the draft?
E-mails sent to the WHATWG list eventually get a reply from me, at which
point, if appropriate, I edit the spec.
For more details, please see the FAQ:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
> If you want this to be tracked, you should open a ticket in the W3C bug
That's unnecessary; I guarantee that I will read and reply to every e-mail
sent to this mailing list that provides new feedback. All pending e-mails
are tracked here:
(This is also why there's no point sending messages that don't introduce
new information, or just say "+1", or repeat an argument already stated in
the thread -- I ignore those e-mails so they can't affect the spec.)
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg