[whatwg] "Content-Disposition" property for <a> tags

Ian Hickson ian at hixie.ch
Sun Sep 26 09:01:35 PDT 2010

On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Dennis Joachimsthaler wrote:
> I'd like to bring this back to attention.
> I don't want this to be forgotten before anybody who is "official" has 
> said their definitive yes or no about it.

This thread has in fact already received an "official" reply:


That e-mail received a reply that I haven't responded to yet:


> Or how else do new additions find their way into the draft?

E-mails sent to the WHATWG list eventually get a reply from me, at which 
point, if appropriate, I edit the spec.

For more details, please see the FAQ:


On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
> If you want this to be tracked, you should open a ticket in the W3C bug 
> tracker.

That's unnecessary; I guarantee that I will read and reply to every e-mail 
sent to this mailing list that provides new feedback. All pending e-mails 
are tracked here:


(This is also why there's no point sending messages that don't introduce 
new information, or just say "+1", or repeat an argument already stated in 
the thread -- I ignore those e-mails so they can't affect the spec.)

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

More information about the whatwg mailing list