[whatwg] ConnectionPeer experiences

[Adam Malcontenti-Wilson]

Hi,
I was noticing how you were suggesting to change
addRemoteConfiguration to setRemoteConfiguration as it appears as a
single-point-to-single-point connection, is this part of the current
specification or could single-point-to-multiple-points connections (or
"clouds") be implemented using the same API in the future? This would
be a big bandwidth saver for users in "group chats" that would make
some sense to use add rather than set (and perhaps have another
optional parameter to replace rather than append or add).

Thanks and sorry for butting in,
-- Adam M-W

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Patrik Persson J
<patrik.j.persson at ericsson.com> wrote:
> Oh, thanks!
>
> Your question is a good one.  We're looking into precisely that, and expect to learn more in our continued implementation work.
>
> We're also participating in the discussion on these matters in RTC-Web [http://rtc-web.alvestrand.com/].
>
> -- Patrik
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk at opera.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 10:38 AM
> To: 'whatwg at lists.whatwg.org'; Patrik Persson J
> Subject: Re: [whatwg] ConnectionPeer experiences
>
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:34:11 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com>
> wrote:
>> Could you elaborate more on the details of the protocol?
>> Handshake/framing/etc. Is it something that can be independently
>> implemented? Agreement on that is what is holding back this API at the
>> moment.
>
> Oh, and also, extremely awesome! :-)
>
>
> --
> Anne van Kesteren
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>



-- 
Adam Malcontenti-Wilson