[whatwg] IBM864 mapping of Encoding Standard

Anne van Kesteren annevk at opera.com
Mon Apr 23 23:49:34 PDT 2012

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:31:57 +0200, Makoto Kato <m_kato at ga2.so-net.ne.jp>  
> Except to OS/2 and AIX, I think that this encoding is unnecessary since  
> most browsers aren't supported.  If you only add IBM864 and IBM866 to  
> this spec as legacy encoding, you should add all encodings that Gecko  
> supports due to ambiguous.

That could work too. Currently 864 is not supported by Opera and 866 is  
not supported by Chrome. As far as I know the other IBM encodings have  
less support. I suppose we should look at content to see how often they  
are still used on pages with bytes greater than 0x7F.

Anne van Kesteren

More information about the whatwg mailing list