[whatwg] StringEncoding: encode() return type looks weird in the IDL
bzbarsky at MIT.EDU
Sun Aug 5 10:44:59 PDT 2012
On 8/5/12 1:39 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> I didn't say it was extensibility, just a leftover from something that
> was either considered and dropped or forgotten about.
Oh, I see. I thought you were talking about leaving the return value
as-is so that Uint16Array return values can be added later.
I'd vote for changing the return type to Uint8Array as things stand, and
if we ever change what the function can return, we change the return
type at that point.
More information about the whatwg