[whatwg] Proposal: Deprecate registerProtocolHandler/registerContentHandler via Web Intents
James Hawkins
jhawkins at google.com
Tue Feb 21 10:44:38 PST 2012
Thanks for your feedback, Bjartur.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Þann mið 15.feb 2012 23:39, skrifaði James Hawkins:
>
> * If |scheme| is specified, |action| *should* (must?) be ignored.
>>
> Why would you forbid distinguishing between actions on URIs? Postal and
> retrieval of mail, for example, are quite distinct actions. As are
> modification and retrieval of documents.
>
I'm not sure if the proposal was explicit enough, but for the RPH-esque
functionality in Web Intents, we activate WI in the same circumstances RPH
is activated, which is when links are activated in a page. Can you
elucidate how the scenarios you listed could be handled? Note these
scenarios are above and beyond RPH, but we're not trying to make the API
self-limiting.
Thanks,
James
More information about the whatwg
mailing list