[whatwg] <video preload> implementation feedback
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Jun 14 11:32:16 PDT 2012
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Simon Pieters wrote:
> It's not more. But it still is. Even though images aren't required to
> load at all, you still recently changed the way they load to be
> compatible (http://html5.org/r/7128 ). We should also specify how videos
> load to be compatible. We can do it now and get everyone to align on a
> good behavior, or we can wait and do it in a few years when Web content
> relies on what the market leader does, whether that's good or bad
I don't understand what behaviour it is that you think we should define.
As far as I can tell, the spec is as detailed as it can be here given the
range of possible implementation strategies that we need to allow.
Could you give a concrete example of what you are concerned about?
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg