[whatwg] Submitting contentEditable Content In A Form -- also in SVG and audio contexts
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Oct 17 18:26:46 PDT 2012
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, David Dailey wrote:
> I don't know if this matters or not, but at some point in time, other
> standards than HTML like <svg> or <audio> might receive sensible
> proposals to allow other media (than just text) to be contentEditable.
> Just as it makes sense to have built in text editors (imagine the
> spectrum ranging from <textarea> to rich web content editors like in
> Google+ and beyond) in a spec that deals with text (as in HyperText ML
> handling such routine things as word-wrap, backspace, delete, select,
> copy, paste etc.), so might it make sense to have a default
> (cross-browser-consistent) generic drawing pad that produces structured
> graphical objects (and not just silly pixelbits) built into a graphical
> element or a default (cross-browser-consistent) sound studio built into
> audio objects. The GUI interfaces for these things have been pretty
> consistent since MacDraw in 1984 and SoundEdit in 1986 so any patents
> with the oft-replicated interface would have expired by now.
> I'm not saying that coherent proposals that meet the acceptance of the
> standards community for such will emerge in the next few years, but at
> some time, the logic for them is likely to eventually overcome the
> resistance. And, in the meantime, it might make sense to make sure that
> what is done with the stuff in HTML is consistent with the broader
> spectrum of possible use cases that will emerge in the future.
That seems reasonable in general. Did you have anything specific in mind
that isn't consistent in this way?
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg