[whatwg] Questions regarding Path object
cabanier at gmail.com
Wed Nov 13 16:31:51 PST 2013
Let's do it.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org>wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jussi Kalliokoski <
> jussi.kalliokoski at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Path is also too generic even in the context of graphics. If we later on
>> want to add a path object for 3-dimensional paths, you end up with Path
>> Path3D? Yay for consistency. Path2D would immediately inform what
>> dimensions we're dealing with and also that this is to do with graphics,
>> and thus sounds like a good name to me.
> Sounds good to me.
> Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
> le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
> 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp
> waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
More information about the whatwg