[whatwg] Questions regarding Path object

[Rik Cabanier]

Sounds good.
Let's do it.


On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jussi Kalliokoski <
> jussi.kalliokoski at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Path is also too generic even in the context of graphics. If we later on
>> want to add a path object for 3-dimensional paths, you end up with Path
>> and
>> Path3D? Yay for consistency. Path2D would immediately inform what
>> dimensions we're dealing with and also that this is to do with graphics,
>> and thus sounds like a good name to me.
>>
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
> le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
> 'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
> waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
>