[whatwg] Questions regarding Path object

Rik Cabanier cabanier at gmail.com
Mon Nov 18 05:14:48 PST 2013

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jussi Kalliokoski <
> jussi.kalliokoski at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Path is also too generic even in the context of graphics. If we later on
>> want to add a path object for 3-dimensional paths, you end up with Path
>> and
>> Path3D? Yay for consistency. Path2D would immediately inform what
>> dimensions we're dealing with and also that this is to do with graphics,
>> and thus sounds like a good name to me.
> Sounds good to me.


what do you think, is Path2D acceptable?

More information about the whatwg mailing list