[whatwg] Questions regarding Path object
esprehn at gmail.com
Mon Nov 18 10:03:08 PST 2013
On Monday, November 18, 2013, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> > wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jussi Kalliokoski <
>> 'jussi.kalliokoski at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>> Path is also too generic even in the context of graphics. If we later on
>>> want to add a path object for 3-dimensional paths, you end up with Path
>>> Path3D? Yay for consistency. Path2D would immediately inform what
>>> dimensions we're dealing with and also that this is to do with graphics,
>>> and thus sounds like a good name to me.
>> Sounds good to me.
> what do you think, is Path2D acceptable?
Sounds great to me, lets do it!
More information about the whatwg