[whatwg] Alignment of empty buttons
bzbarsky at MIT.EDU
Sun Nov 24 19:40:03 PST 2013
On 11/24/13 10:27 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> (That's non-conforming, as far as I can tell, for what it's worth. The
> HTML spec says you're supposed to render elements according to what they
> represent, and <option> elements represent an option in a select, with a
> label, value, etc; children elements have no bearing on all this.)
I realize that's your opinion and what you've put in the spec for now, yes.
>> Some do not. How are they not replaced elements in the latter?
> I don't know what it would mean for them to be replaced elements. The
> <select> is a replaced element, but its contents have no bearing on the
> CSS spec at all.
Seriously, how is this different from <svg> being a replaced element
with a <foreignObject> inside, apart from arbitrarily deciding that it
should be different?
> But this doesn't seem like a productive avenue of debate, since we've
> already agreed that the term we're debating is defined incorrectly anyway.
More information about the whatwg