text/html not allowed for WF2 documents? (Was: [whatwg] Re: repetition model)

[Ian Hickson]

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
>
> if it does, then the WF2 couldn't be served as text/html either unless
> it went to the W3C who have change control over it chose to change the
> registration.

That is technically correct. The intent would be to update the text/html
RFC to cover these HTML extensions (and to generally make that RFC much
less ambiguous) once this work entered the final phases of
standardisation, in much the same way as it was updated when HTML4 reached
those stages.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'