[whatwg] SPOOFED: Re: SPOOFED: Re: ---
herenvardo at gmail.com
Sun Nov 9 10:30:46 PST 2008
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Eduard Pascual wrote:
>> Can somebody put forward any technical argument against this idea?
> For my benefit, could you succintly summarise the changes that this would
> involve to the spec? I'm not sure I really understand the proposal at the
> concrete level.
Sure! I'd like to speak with Pentasis first (it was him who started
this thread with this suggestion), to make sure we have the similar
idea in mind (or to cover both viewpoints if needed), before putting
something more concrete together, so just give us a couple of days or
so to discuss these details; and we'll make our best to word it in a
succint and concrete way.
> Also, it would be helpful to have a clear summary of the use cases.
Definitely, it would. I'll try to put together the cases Pentasis and
I have in mind, and also do some research through the web to try find
out those cases that might have gone unnoticed.
So, expect a more formal (and concrete) reply within a few days.
More information about the whatwg