[whatwg] article/section/details naming/definition problems
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Sep 16 04:28:36 PDT 2009
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Bruce Lawson wrote:
> Seems to me that (current) sections aren't for syndicating (tabs,
> chapters etc), while blog posts (currently articles) *are* for potential
> syndication (although the cite attribute was recently removed from
I've adjusted the spec's definition more in line with this.
> A comment in an article is also marked up as article, but is unlikely to
> be a candidate for syndication as it's out of context.
> Is this correct?
As James on IRC pointed out:
Also, consider Twitter, Reddit, most forums, etc, where individual
comments are definitely syndicated.
cite="" was removed because it's already possible to include a permalink
using <a>, by the way:
<a href="/1234" rel="bookmark">#</a>
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg