[whatwg] article/section/details naming/definition problems
brucel at opera.com
Wed Sep 16 04:28:13 PDT 2009
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:28:36 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Bruce Lawson wrote:
>> Seems to me that (current) sections aren't for syndicating (tabs,
>> chapters etc), while blog posts (currently articles) *are* for potential
>> syndication (although the cite attribute was recently removed from
> I've adjusted the spec's definition more in line with this.
>> A comment in an article is also marked up as article, but is unlikely to
>> be a candidate for syndication as it's out of context.
>> Is this correct?
> As James on IRC pointed out:
> Also, consider Twitter, Reddit, most forums, etc, where individual
> comments are definitely syndicated.
Yup. Makes sense to me.
More information about the whatwg